Sunday, February 27, 2011

Whither the Individual?

Whither the Individual?

As we join groups and social networks from affinity sites to Facebook, are we extending and expanding identities, or increasingly conforming to the cookie-cutter profiles demanded of these interfaces? Is the loss of "personal space" and "reflection" so many users complain of merely the necessary surrender of "ego" as we learn to participate as members of a more evolved "collective organism" of "hyper-people?"



     Social networking websites, such as Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter, have become important mediums for the current generation.  Marshall McLuhan defines a medium as an extenion of ourselves.  These websites have had a large impact on social interaction.  While there are some users of these sites that use them as an extension of themselves, a good amount of users begin to conform to an identical set of interests.  This conformity also leads to a conflict of interest between wanting to protect your privacy and wanting acceptance from the other users of the site.

      Websites, such as Facebook, allow users to communicate with a wide group of people in a manner that would have previously been much more difficult and time consuming.  You can communicate with someone across the world with the same ease as communicating with someone living right next to you.  Facebook "friends" encompass a much larger group than the people you would consider friends in real life.  I will often receive friend requests from people who I only met for a brief period of time.  While in real life it might be somewhat difficult to locate these people if you did not exchange phone numbers, Facebook makes it easy to contact them, allowing you to further extend your identity.  Social networking websites have allowed people to have at least some basic knowledge about a much larger group of people than ever before.
    
     Social networking websites can be a great way to show things that interest you to others.  You can make posts with embedded videos and images to share with your friends.  This can help to better inform people of your interests, "expanding" our identities.  Although this is done by many people, there seems to be a substantial amount of people who conform to a common set of interests.  These people all make extremely similar posts and seem to like all of the same types of music, movies and other entertainment.  I believe this is a result of their desire for acceptance from the other members of the site.  This makes Facebook a great marketing investment, as if the product is well received by some of the more conforming members of the site, their other friends will likely also follow suit and begin using the product.  This can cut down greatly on the costs of advertisement, as much of the information will be passed through word of mouth.

     A frequent complaint about social networking websites is the loss of privacy.  Everything is much more public than it was in the past.  Just by going on Facebook, you can get a very good idea of what your friends were doing on the weekend.  While many complain about the loss of privacy, it is mostly a self-caused problem.  If someone does not want a large amount of people to know something about themselves, they should not post it on the internet, or allow it to be posted by their friends.  I believe that the people who complain of a loss of privacy have a conflict of interests with their want for privacy and their previously mentioned desire for acceptance.  The majority of Facebook users post pictures of their activities online, and some may think that it would be viewed as strange to not display these pictures.  Those who are concerned about privacy may disregard their concerns to be able to display pictures like the rest of their friends.

     If anything, social networking websites have led to an increase of ego and focus on the individual.  Many members of these websites will post uninteresting things that they plan on doing under the impression that other people want to know (ex: a status update saying "going to the mall").  Since the days of MySpace, people at parties have been interrupted by people with cameras wanting to take an excessive amount of pictures to post online.  For an extended period of time in within the last year there was a fad where people on Facebook, predominantly women, would "like" a certain activity. It would then display that they liked this activity on all of their friend's homepage.  These people would often "like" upwards of 100 activities in one sitting.  If there is anything that points to a growth of ego, this may well be it.

     Social networking platforms certainly have their benefits.  They make it far easier to send messages to large groups of people, and can help to give acquaintances a better understanding of each other.  They can also lead to a potential loss of individuality, loss of privacy, and the creation of an overinflated ego.  Regardless, the social networking medium has become ingrained into modern society, and does not show signs of slowing down.

Sunday, February 20, 2011

1) Today many TV shows and advertisements try to look amateurish or "homegrown" to emulate what is often seen on the Web. Do you think professional production values will continue to drop, or do you think amateur user-generated content will get better over time? WHY??

I do not believe that the recent rise in popularity of professional "amateur" styled production will continue.  While some films have had interesting applications for this presentation, for example Paranormal Activity and The Blair Witch Project, it seems like more of a gimmick than a technique that will see frequent use.  While both of the aforementioned films were decent entertainment, I don't believe that there will ever be a great film made from this type of production.  Over time the quality of home-made productions will also improve due to advances in camera technology, narrowing the difference in quality between amateur production and the traditional level of professional production.  This will make the lower quality professional productions have less of the "personal" feel that they are aiming for, as home-made movies will not necessarily look much worse than the professional standard.

2) What social media sites do you find yourself using the most, and why? In your opinion why is Facebook so much more successful than MySpace, and do you think Facebook is "here to stay" for the long term.


I find myself making frequent use of Facebook and Youtube.  Facebook allows me to share things with a large amount of my friends simultaneously and can help to organize events.  Youtube is just a fun source of entertainment.  Often interesting videos will be passed around among my friends through Facebook.  I think that Facebook has become more successful than MySpace because it is better organized.  I haven't used MySpace for years, so I don't know how much has changed, but when I first started using Facebook it was far quicker to navigate around the site.  The customization allowed on MySpace often made the pages disorganized and slow.  Facebook also notified you of activity relating to your account from any area of the site you happened to be on.  On MySpace you had to go back to your main page to see if anyone had sent you a response, which slowed down conversations.  I believe that Facebook will continue its popularity unless a better social networking website is created, in which case there would likely be a shift from Facebook to the new site similar to the shift from MySpace to Facebook.  I think social networking websites as a whole will be here to stay, as they have become so ingrained in our culture that the lives of many people would be substantially affected by their removal.

3) Why is transparency such an important concept in the Social Media world? Is it MORE or LESS important in the offline world? Why?


Transparency is an important concept for social media because information given through social media will likely be biased by the author's opinions or motives.  Unlike traditional media, although there is certainly still bias in traditional media, in social media the authors are not held accountable by anyone. For example when someone creates a Facebook page and uses it to spread information, they do it for their own benefit.  There is no one to screen this information for accuracy before it is delivered to the public.  As a result, the recipients of this information need to take it with a degree of skepticism.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Photoshop - 2nd Medium

Online video games are a rapidly growing source of entertainment. They allow you to compete against people from all around the world. They can help maintain contact between friends who live too far apart to have frequent visits (ex: college students). Unfortunately, many of these competitors from around the world happen to be small children screaming in high pitched voices, leading to the irritation of much of the online community.

Monday, February 14, 2011

McLuhan Photoshop Final Post

Ebay, along with other online marketplaces, can be used as an extension of ourselves to buy and sell products in a much larger market than ever before.  The internet removes any geographic restrictions on trade, making it just as easy to sell a product to someone in your town as it is to sell a product to someone across the country.  This can all be accomplished without a storefront by working out of your home.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

New Mediums

Ebay, Amazon, and similar online marketplaces have allowed for less common products to be more easily found and purchased.  Some people have managed to make a living selling products through these interfaces.

With the popularization of online video games, people are now able to participate in games and get into yelling matches with people halfway around the world.

Video hosting websites such as Youtube can allow for previously unknown people to spread their opinions or talents quickly and easily through word of mouth without having to spend money creating publicity.